Logarithmic Loss in Machine Learning Models for Liver Cirrhosis Detection.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2024.1.1.1781Keywords:
Liver Cirrhosis, Classification Models, Log Loss, Cross Validation, Machine LearningAbstract
Accurately predicting the survival rate of patients with cirrhosis is very important in healthcare. In this study, we compared five classification models using Mayo Clinic data for primary biliary cirrhosis. The log loss score is used to evaluate the accuracy of the model in predicting survival. RandomForest shows the lowest log loss, followed by LogisticRegression and SVM with consistent prediction accuracy. On the other hand, Naive Bayes and kNN show more accurate results. K-fold cross-validation verifies the stability of the model. Limitations such as dataset dependency and lack of cirrhosis-specific studies were identified, indicating the need for future external validation and development of more accurate models applicable in clinical settings. In conclusion, RandomForest stands out for its high performance, but it is essential to carefully evaluate other models before clinical implementation to predict survival in cirrhotic patients.Downloads
Published
2024-07-27
Issue
Section
Articles
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2024 LACCEI
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
LACCEI retains copyright of all published articles under the terms of its copyright transfer agreement. As the copyright holder, LACCEI distributes the articles to the public under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
How to Cite
Patiño-Pérez, D., Molina-Calderón, M., Ochoa-Flores, Ángel, & Castro-Carrasco, J. (2024). Logarithmic Loss in Machine Learning Models for Liver Cirrhosis Detection. LACCEI, 1(10). https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2024.1.1.1781