Ultrasonic technologies versus Artificial Intelligence in canes for people with visual impairments: A systematic review

Authors

  • Edward José Flores Masías Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal - (PE), Perú
  • Wilfredo Soto-Palomino Universidad Tecnológica de los Andes, Perú
  • Carmen Palomino-Peralta Universidad Tecnológica de los Andes, Perú
  • Cesar-Raul Cuba-Aguilar Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal - (PE), Perú

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2026.1.1.871

Keywords:

smart canes, visual impairment, ultrasonic technology, artificial intelligence.

Abstract

Abstract– This study examines the smart canes that have emerged in recent years to support people with visual impairments. The study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of three main technologies in smart canes for people with visual impairments: ultrasonic, artificial intelligence (AI), and hybrid systems. The methodology involved a systematic review of literature published between 2020 and 2025. Eight independent searches were conducted in four databases, identifying 908 initial articles, which were reduced to 180 unique articles after duplicate removal. The following dimensions were evaluated: accuracy, detection range, user satisfaction, autonomy, response speed, and environmental robustness. The results showed that hybrid systems obtained the highest overall score (89.2/100), with 95% accuracy, a range of 0.3–9 m, and 93.5% user satisfaction. Ultrasonic systems achieved a score of 87.4/100, standing out for their low cost. Systems based solely on AI scored 80.1/100, limited by shorter autonomy and vulnerability in low-light conditions (60-65% performance). The study concluded that hybrid systems represent the state of the art in overall effectiveness, but ultrasonic systems demonstrate surprising competitiveness. There is no single optimal solution; the choice depends on the context of use, budget, and specific needs. Critical gaps were identified in longitudinal studies, evaluations in diverse real-world contexts, and rigorous economic analyses.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-27

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

LACCEI retains copyright of all published articles under the terms of its copyright transfer agreement. As the copyright holder, LACCEI distributes the articles to the public under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

How to Cite

Flores Masías, E. J., Soto-Palomino, W., Palomino-Peralta, C., & Cuba-Aguilar, C.-R. (2026). Ultrasonic technologies versus Artificial Intelligence in canes for people with visual impairments: A systematic review. LACCEI, 1(14). https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2026.1.1.871

Most read articles by the same author(s)