Risk analysis in NEC type B contracts, a case study in Peru
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2025.1.1.1927Palabras clave:
Risk allocation, NEC contracts, controversies, contracts, state contractingResumen
The study examines risk management in traditional unit price contracts under the State Contracting Law (LCE) in public works on the northern coast of Peru, impacted by natural phenomena such as the El Niño Phenomenon, contrasting them with NEC Option B contracts. 50 contracts were evaluated through official sources such as SEACE and OSCE, in addition to conducting surveys with 30 professionals and interviews with 22 specialists. The findings indicate that the risks associated with natural phenomena, technical failures and social disputes are mainly attributed to contractors, causing disputes, excessive expenses and de-lays. On the other hand, NEC Option B contracts offer fairer risk management, versatility in scope modifications and better contractual relationships, thus reducing conflicts. The study determines that the application of NEC Option B contracts in public infrastructure projects could significantly enhance risk management in Peru. It is advisable to train experts in the industry and make changes to regulations to simplify their implementation. The implementation of this model has the potential to reduce disputes and enhance the effectiveness of projects, guaranteeing their feasibility and long-term sustainability.Descargas
Publicado
2025-07-27
Número
Sección
Articles
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 LACCEI

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Cómo citar
Yuncar Solis, M. L., Noa Ataypoma, F., Beltran Leon, F. J., Tomaylla Bejarano, A. F., & Huaricallo Vilca, Y. (2025). Risk analysis in NEC type B contracts, a case study in Peru. LACCEI, 1(12). https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2025.1.1.1927