Educational Innovation in a Chemistry Course for Engineering: A Comparative Study between Traditional Learning and Active Learning.

Authors

  • JENNY MARÍA VENEGAS GALLO Escuela Superior Politécnica Del Litoral, ESPOL, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Departamento de Ciencias Químicas y Ambientales, Campus Gustavo Galindo, Km. 30.5 vía Perimetral, Guayaquil Ecuador
  • JOEL EDUARDO VIELMA-PUENTE Escuela Superior Politécnica Del Litoral, ESPOL, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Departamento de Ciencias Químicas y Ambientales, Campus Gustavo Galindo, Km. 30.5 vía Perimetral, Guayaquil Ecuador
  • LUIS ANTONIO VACA SALAZAR Escuela Superior Politécnica Del Litoral, ESPOL, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Departamento de Ciencias Químicas y Ambientales, Campus Gustavo Galindo, Km. 30.5 vía Perimetral, Guayaquil Ecuador
  • ANDREA CRISTINA GARCIA ANGULO Escuela Superior Politécnica Del Litoral, ESPOL, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Campus Gustavo Galindo, Km. 30.5 vía Perimetral, Guayaquil Ecuador

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2024.1.1.921

Keywords:

active learning, flipped learning, problem-based learning, peer learning, traditional learning

Abstract

This study compares the academic performance of first-semester university students in a General Chemistry course under traditional teaching method and an active learning approach that integrates flipped learning, problem-based learning, and peer learning. The results reveal significantly higher average academic performances in the active methodology compared to the traditional one. The findings support the effectiveness of a combined approach, addressing the limitations of traditional teaching and fostering an active learning experience.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-27

How to Cite

VENEGAS GALLO, J. M., VIELMA-PUENTE, J. E., VACA SALAZAR, L. A., & GARCIA ANGULO, A. C. (2024). Educational Innovation in a Chemistry Course for Engineering: A Comparative Study between Traditional Learning and Active Learning. LACCEI, 1(10). https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2024.1.1.921

Most read articles by the same author(s)