The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Learning Support: Evaluation of a Digital Tool Aimed at Academic Self-Regulation

Authors

  • Rocío González Universidad Siglo 21, Argentine Republic
  • Cecilia Losano Universidad Siglo 21, Argentine Republic
  • Pía Saravia Universidad Siglo 21, Argentine Republic
  • Luis Morera Universidad Siglo 21, Argentine Republic
  • Pablo Rivarola Universidad Siglo 21, Argentine Republic
  • Leonardo Adrián Medrano Universidad Siglo 21, Argentine Republic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2026.1.1.1373

Keywords:

AI, educational innovation, self-regulated learning, procrastination, self-efficacy

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI)–based educational platforms are increasingly used in higher education to support academic organization and self-regulated learning. This study describes user experience, adoption barriers, and self-regulated learning indicators associated with implementing an AI tool that assists students with academic planning and the development of self-regulation skills. The tool combines generative models and learning analytics to deliver personalized recommendations, improve time management, and encourage effective study habits. Fifty students participated; 19 reported using the tool and 31 reported not using it. Among users, perceived usability and integration were high: 84.2% indicated that platform functions were well integrated and 79.0% reported that the tool was easy to use. Confidence and intention to continue were also favorable, with 89.5% reporting that they felt confident using the tool, were interested in frequent continued use, and believed that most people could learn it quickly. Regarding self-regulated learning, 84.2% reported being able to understand and learn both basic and difficult content, and 78.5% felt capable of achieving self-set goals. However, sustained planning behaviors were less consistent: 68.4% reported keeping up with studying through a structured schedule, whereas 26.3% reported studying only before exams. Procrastination-related execution difficulties were common (42.1% delaying non-preferred tasks; 36.8% struggling to start important tasks; 31.6% waiting until the last moment for deadlines). Study strategies suggested room for improvement (42.1% relying on repetition; 15.8% memorizing without understanding). Overall, the tool was positively appraised for usability and integration, while highlighting opportunities to strengthen sustained planning and deeper learning strategies in future deployments.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-27

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

LACCEI retains copyright of all published articles under the terms of its copyright transfer agreement. As the copyright holder, LACCEI distributes the articles to the public under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

How to Cite

González, R., Losano, C., Saravia, P., Morera, L., Rivarola, P., & Medrano, L. A. (2026). The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Learning Support: Evaluation of a Digital Tool Aimed at Academic Self-Regulation. LACCEI, 1(14). https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2026.1.1.1373

Most read articles by the same author(s)